Marin Energy Freedom

Responsibility to thrive!

 

Clean Energy News Slider

1 2 345678910

Marin Energy Authority cements deal with Shell; cost of energy meets expectations

image

The Marin Energy Authority this week locked in the wholesale price that it will pay Shell Energy North America over the next five years for the electricity that it will sell to its Marin customers. At the price Shell is charging, the authority will be able to fulfill it promise to offer customers electricity that comes from 25 percent renewable sources for the same amount that Pacific Gas and Electric Co. is currently charging, said Dawn Weisz, the authority's interim director

Editorial: Vote no on Prop. 16

image

To understand what's wrong with California's initiative process, all you need to do is look at Proposition 16 on the June 8 ballot. This outrageous measure is funded by more than $25 million from PG&E, and its sole purpose is to protect PG&E profits.

Supervisors challenge civil grand jury on Marin Clean Energy

image

Richard Halstead, Marin IJ The Marin Board of Supervisors on Tuesday rejected most of the findings contained in a civil grand jury report that recommended pulling the plug on the Marin Clean Energy initiative. The initiative, a program of the Marin Energy Authority, aims at reducing greenhouse gases by offering Marin residents the opportunity to purchase electricity generated from a higher percentage of renewable sources than offered by Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

California Counties Say “No” to Prop. 16

image

The CSAC Board of Directors voted today to oppose Prop. 16, the initiative that would limit local government’s ability to expand local energy programs. While the board was presented with both sides of the argument, their decision was relatively quick and easy. CSAC’s Agriculture & Natural Resources Policy Committee and Executive Committee had both already recommended an “oppose” position.

Dan Morain: PG&E flips the switch on a ballot power play

image

It was an unhappy anniversary that passed without public fanfare. But nine years ago last week, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., ravaged by the energy crisis, plunged into bankruptcy. Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/11/2668460/dan-morain-pge-flips-the-switch.html#ixzz0kttFHqCa

We Are Appalled,' Declared CPUC About 2004 PG&E Executive Bonus Scandal -- 'Give It Back'

image

The lead sentence in last Friday's San Francisco Chroniclearticle (headline: "PG&E Must Stop Threats To Public Power Agencies") hints at the dilemma Peter Darbee's political recklessness has created for his company and its heretofore guardian angels, the California Public Utilities Commission: California energy regulators delivered a rare rebuke to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. on Thursday, banning some of thehardball tactics the utility has used in its efforts to derail Marin County's new public power agency.

Belvedere Opted In At Deep Green

image

Sacramento-area voters, responding to a Sacramento Bee-led crusade, voted in 1923 to divorce themselves from On Monday night the Belvedere City Council voted 4-1 in favor of moving the City to 100% Deep Green with Marin Clean Energy. In doing so, the Council made a statement that this is an important issue. Belvedere became the second municipality in Marin to go 100% Deep Green as part of its ratepayer choice.

Facts and FAQ about the SMUD Annexation

image

On average, SMUD rates are nearly 30% lower than PG&E – in the medium commercial rate structure, SMUD rates are nearly 36% lower SMUD has guaranteed an immediate 2% rate reduction during the time that the acquisition costs are recovered – anticipated to be five to ten years

"Common Sense" Versus Extreme Weather and Climate Disruption

image

Ed Mainland - I was chatting with a nice Marin lady at Joe Nation's PG&E-funded "Common Sense Coalition" February 27. She doesn't believe all this global warming stuff. "There's always been carbon dioxide in the air," she said. She knows what she knows and doesn't want to know more.

John Geesman Stands and Delivers

image

Peter Darbee's Dog of an Initiative: 3 Tapeworms Eating Away at the Internal Logic of Prop. 16 On February 25, I had the privilege of testifying on Proposition 16 before the joint hearing of the California Senate Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee and the California Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee. This is what I said:

<< >> Play > Stop

Welcome to Marin Energy Freedom
PG&E has no friends PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tim Redmond   
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 15:25
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The full-page ad on the back of the front section of today's San Francisco Chronicle shows exactly how far PG&E has fallen in its political fortunes.

The Yes on 16 ad lists all endorsers of this godawful ballot measure -- and other than the Chamber of Commerce, there's not one San Francisco politician, community group, or organization on the list. Not one.

In fact, there's not one statewide elected official. Nobody wants to carry PG&E's water any more (unless you count the California Republican Party and the San Bernadino County Tea Party, two listed endorsers who will no doubt sway a lot of votes in the Bay Area).

Read more: PG&E has no friends
 
Jen & Eva on Prop 16 PG&E and Funnel Cake - Funny and True PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ben Zolno   
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 10:30
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The voters are getting education one voter, maybe two, at a time, spread the word, Vote NO On Prop 16
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 26 May 2010 10:36 )
 
Proposition 16 Part Two: Is two-thirds too high a bar? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Alan Marsden   
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 08:42
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

(watch news report top right of the page) "You gotta beat 16 or what do you get, another day older and deeper in debt, saint peter don't you call me cuz I ain't free. I owe my soul to PG&E."

Why would something with such an in-offensive name as "The Tax Payer's Right to Vote Act" meet such bitter opposition? Prop 16 would impose a new two-thirds voter approval requirement before local governments could spend public money to get into the electricity business. But editorials in newspapers around the state have come out against the ballot measure saying it would actually give customers less say about where their electricity comes from.

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 26 May 2010 08:47 )
Read more: Proposition 16 Part Two: Is two-thirds too high a bar?
 
Opinion: PUC head: Reject Prop 16's outrageous bid for monopoly power PDF Print E-mail
Written by Michael R. Peevey   
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 06:46
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Special to the Mercury News

 

The California Public Utilities Commission was created nearly 100 years ago as a constitutional agency to protect consumers from the abuses of monopoly power.

Having observed firsthand the undue influence of Sacramento's hordes of railroad and other lobbyists in the state Capitol, Gov. Hiram Johnson placed the Railroad Commission, as it was originally named, in relatively distant San Francisco.

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 26 May 2010 07:23 )
Read more: Opinion: PUC head: Reject Prop 16's outrageous bid for monopoly power
 
Another view on Prop 16 PDF Print E-mail
Written by NBC Bay Area   
Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:31
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/video

Propositions 16 and 17

Voter Empowerment or Special Interest? NBC Bay Area takes a stand on Propositions 16 and 17.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 18

Translate MarinEnergyFreedom

Deep Green Sign up

Sign up for Deep Green Today
Banner
Be part of the solution!

Follow us on Facebook

Come join us on Facebook
Banner
Protect your right to Energy Freedom

No on 16

Take a Stand
Banner
Get Involved

No on 16

no-16

Follow MEF on Twitter

Twitter with us
Banner
Follow Now

YouTube