Marin Energy Freedom

Responsibility to thrive!

 

Clean Energy News Slider

1 2 345678910

Marin Energy Authority cements deal with Shell; cost of energy meets expectations

image

The Marin Energy Authority this week locked in the wholesale price that it will pay Shell Energy North America over the next five years for the electricity that it will sell to its Marin customers. At the price Shell is charging, the authority will be able to fulfill it promise to offer customers electricity that comes from 25 percent renewable sources for the same amount that Pacific Gas and Electric Co. is currently charging, said Dawn Weisz, the authority's interim director

Editorial: Vote no on Prop. 16

image

To understand what's wrong with California's initiative process, all you need to do is look at Proposition 16 on the June 8 ballot. This outrageous measure is funded by more than $25 million from PG&E, and its sole purpose is to protect PG&E profits.

Supervisors challenge civil grand jury on Marin Clean Energy

image

Richard Halstead, Marin IJ The Marin Board of Supervisors on Tuesday rejected most of the findings contained in a civil grand jury report that recommended pulling the plug on the Marin Clean Energy initiative. The initiative, a program of the Marin Energy Authority, aims at reducing greenhouse gases by offering Marin residents the opportunity to purchase electricity generated from a higher percentage of renewable sources than offered by Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

California Counties Say “No” to Prop. 16

image

The CSAC Board of Directors voted today to oppose Prop. 16, the initiative that would limit local government’s ability to expand local energy programs. While the board was presented with both sides of the argument, their decision was relatively quick and easy. CSAC’s Agriculture & Natural Resources Policy Committee and Executive Committee had both already recommended an “oppose” position.

Dan Morain: PG&E flips the switch on a ballot power play

image

It was an unhappy anniversary that passed without public fanfare. But nine years ago last week, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., ravaged by the energy crisis, plunged into bankruptcy. Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/11/2668460/dan-morain-pge-flips-the-switch.html#ixzz0kttFHqCa

We Are Appalled,' Declared CPUC About 2004 PG&E Executive Bonus Scandal -- 'Give It Back'

image

The lead sentence in last Friday's San Francisco Chroniclearticle (headline: "PG&E Must Stop Threats To Public Power Agencies") hints at the dilemma Peter Darbee's political recklessness has created for his company and its heretofore guardian angels, the California Public Utilities Commission: California energy regulators delivered a rare rebuke to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. on Thursday, banning some of thehardball tactics the utility has used in its efforts to derail Marin County's new public power agency.

Belvedere Opted In At Deep Green

image

Sacramento-area voters, responding to a Sacramento Bee-led crusade, voted in 1923 to divorce themselves from On Monday night the Belvedere City Council voted 4-1 in favor of moving the City to 100% Deep Green with Marin Clean Energy. In doing so, the Council made a statement that this is an important issue. Belvedere became the second municipality in Marin to go 100% Deep Green as part of its ratepayer choice.

Facts and FAQ about the SMUD Annexation

image

On average, SMUD rates are nearly 30% lower than PG&E – in the medium commercial rate structure, SMUD rates are nearly 36% lower SMUD has guaranteed an immediate 2% rate reduction during the time that the acquisition costs are recovered – anticipated to be five to ten years

"Common Sense" Versus Extreme Weather and Climate Disruption

image

Ed Mainland - I was chatting with a nice Marin lady at Joe Nation's PG&E-funded "Common Sense Coalition" February 27. She doesn't believe all this global warming stuff. "There's always been carbon dioxide in the air," she said. She knows what she knows and doesn't want to know more.

John Geesman Stands and Delivers

image

Peter Darbee's Dog of an Initiative: 3 Tapeworms Eating Away at the Internal Logic of Prop. 16 On February 25, I had the privilege of testifying on Proposition 16 before the joint hearing of the California Senate Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee and the California Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee. This is what I said:

<< >> Play > Stop

Larkspur City Council - No on Prop 16 Vote PDF Print E-mail
Written by Staff   
Thursday, 04 March 2010 19:18
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

DONE - Larkspur passed resolution

 

YEAH--we got a resolution to oppose Prop 16 onto the Larkspur City Council agenda for next month.

The idea of passing a resolution against Prop 16 was presented to City Councilmember Larry Chu earlier today, who then announced that request at the meeting tonight. Subsequently, the Council decided it was an idea worthy of discussion, and agreed to agendize it for April.

In his comments to his colleagues, Councilmember Chu focused on

  1. impact on local control

  2. 2/3 majority vote requirement, MCE did not figure into the effective logic that he used. In public comments speakers refrained focusing attention to MCE and instead repeated Chu's 2 points and added

  3. no competition will lead to near monopoly with higher rates for ratepayers... noting PGE already is among highest rates in US and

  4. impact on future of renewable energy in a community that has demonstrated its commitment to sustainable lifestyles .. PG $E's lack of commitment/ ability to meeting RPS standard/should 16 pass the utility has the ability to negatively affect potential growth of RE in Larkspur/all of CA (I did  throw in MCE there in reference to 25 % RE vs. PG$E's current inability to meet the 20...)

Please encourage your Larkspur contacts to  attend public comment time at the Larkspur City Council meeting next month and speak up in favor of a resolution against Prop 16. When I get date (not sure if it will be 1st or 3rd Wed of month) will pass along via this site.

Send Letters of support for a Resolution against Prop 16 to

Larkspur City Council members:

Mayor Joan Lundstrom -  jlundstrom@larkspurcityhall.org

Vice Mayor Larry Chu - lchu@larkspurcityhall.org

Councilmember Dan Hillmer -  dhillmer@larkspurcityhall.org

Councilmember  Len Rifkind -  lrifkind@larkspurcityhall.org

Councilmember Kathy Hartzel l - khartzell@larkspurcityhall.org

 

 

Last Updated ( Sunday, 11 April 2010 16:35 )
 

Translate MarinEnergyFreedom

Deep Green Sign up

Sign up for Deep Green Today
Banner
Be part of the solution!

Follow us on Facebook

Come join us on Facebook
Banner
Protect your right to Energy Freedom

No on 16

Take a Stand
Banner
Get Involved

No on 16

no-16

Follow MEF on Twitter

Twitter with us
Banner
Follow Now

YouTube