Marin Energy Freedom

Responsibility to thrive!

 

Clean Energy News Slider

1 2 345678910

Marin Energy Authority cements deal with Shell; cost of energy meets expectations

image

The Marin Energy Authority this week locked in the wholesale price that it will pay Shell Energy North America over the next five years for the electricity that it will sell to its Marin customers. At the price Shell is charging, the authority will be able to fulfill it promise to offer customers electricity that comes from 25 percent renewable sources for the same amount that Pacific Gas and Electric Co. is currently charging, said Dawn Weisz, the authority's interim director

Editorial: Vote no on Prop. 16

image

To understand what's wrong with California's initiative process, all you need to do is look at Proposition 16 on the June 8 ballot. This outrageous measure is funded by more than $25 million from PG&E, and its sole purpose is to protect PG&E profits.

Supervisors challenge civil grand jury on Marin Clean Energy

image

Richard Halstead, Marin IJ The Marin Board of Supervisors on Tuesday rejected most of the findings contained in a civil grand jury report that recommended pulling the plug on the Marin Clean Energy initiative. The initiative, a program of the Marin Energy Authority, aims at reducing greenhouse gases by offering Marin residents the opportunity to purchase electricity generated from a higher percentage of renewable sources than offered by Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

California Counties Say “No” to Prop. 16

image

The CSAC Board of Directors voted today to oppose Prop. 16, the initiative that would limit local government’s ability to expand local energy programs. While the board was presented with both sides of the argument, their decision was relatively quick and easy. CSAC’s Agriculture & Natural Resources Policy Committee and Executive Committee had both already recommended an “oppose” position.

Dan Morain: PG&E flips the switch on a ballot power play

image

It was an unhappy anniversary that passed without public fanfare. But nine years ago last week, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., ravaged by the energy crisis, plunged into bankruptcy. Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/11/2668460/dan-morain-pge-flips-the-switch.html#ixzz0kttFHqCa

We Are Appalled,' Declared CPUC About 2004 PG&E Executive Bonus Scandal -- 'Give It Back'

image

The lead sentence in last Friday's San Francisco Chroniclearticle (headline: "PG&E Must Stop Threats To Public Power Agencies") hints at the dilemma Peter Darbee's political recklessness has created for his company and its heretofore guardian angels, the California Public Utilities Commission: California energy regulators delivered a rare rebuke to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. on Thursday, banning some of thehardball tactics the utility has used in its efforts to derail Marin County's new public power agency.

Belvedere Opted In At Deep Green

image

Sacramento-area voters, responding to a Sacramento Bee-led crusade, voted in 1923 to divorce themselves from On Monday night the Belvedere City Council voted 4-1 in favor of moving the City to 100% Deep Green with Marin Clean Energy. In doing so, the Council made a statement that this is an important issue. Belvedere became the second municipality in Marin to go 100% Deep Green as part of its ratepayer choice.

Facts and FAQ about the SMUD Annexation

image

On average, SMUD rates are nearly 30% lower than PG&E – in the medium commercial rate structure, SMUD rates are nearly 36% lower SMUD has guaranteed an immediate 2% rate reduction during the time that the acquisition costs are recovered – anticipated to be five to ten years

"Common Sense" Versus Extreme Weather and Climate Disruption

image

Ed Mainland - I was chatting with a nice Marin lady at Joe Nation's PG&E-funded "Common Sense Coalition" February 27. She doesn't believe all this global warming stuff. "There's always been carbon dioxide in the air," she said. She knows what she knows and doesn't want to know more.

John Geesman Stands and Delivers

image

Peter Darbee's Dog of an Initiative: 3 Tapeworms Eating Away at the Internal Logic of Prop. 16 On February 25, I had the privilege of testifying on Proposition 16 before the joint hearing of the California Senate Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee and the California Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee. This is what I said:

<< >> Play > Stop

Novato - Corte Madera - Take Action on Prop 16 PDF Print E-mail
Written by Staff   
Sunday, 14 March 2010 13:17
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Novato and Corte Madera residents, fill in the blanks below and rush this letter of support to your town/city council members. Have them take a stand against PG&E's Monopoly Protection Act, Prop 16.

 

Novato meets 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month; for email to all members:   novatocouncil@ci.novato.ca.us or for individual phone and emails: http://www.ci.novato.ca.us/Index.aspx?page=289 .

Corte Madera Town Council meets the First and Third Tuesdays of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. for individual council member phone and email: http://www.ci.corte-madera.ca.us/town_council/index.html

Copy and paste the sample letter or write your own.
---------------------

Dear Members of the XXX City Council,

I respectfully write to urge your Council to follow the wisdom demonstrated by the Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers (MCCMC) in their recent issuance of a resolution that affirms MCCMC's opposition to the "New 2/3 Vote Requirement for Local Public Electricity Providers" (Proposition 16).  Prop 16 has some very damaging effects that work against the public interest  By amending the CA Constitution,  Prop 16 will undermine local governance, and community government will be further crippled by requiring a 2/3 majority vote --and we're all too familiar with the devastating local impacts of  2/3 votes in our State.  The governance issues stand by themselves...not to mention the issue of inevitable rate hikes in the absence of competition (that's the end result of Prop 16 --no competition)

Numerous individual Town and City Councils have joined the MCCMC in stating their opposition to Prop 16.  These include the Ross Town Council (like yours, not a member of MEA), which passed the Resolution without dissent.

I respectfully encourage your Council to do the same in voicing your opposition to this potentially very damaging ballot initiative.

Thank you.

(name and address)

 

Translate MarinEnergyFreedom

Deep Green Sign up

Sign up for Deep Green Today
Banner
Be part of the solution!

Follow us on Facebook

Come join us on Facebook
Banner
Protect your right to Energy Freedom

No on 16

Take a Stand
Banner
Get Involved

No on 16

no-16

Follow MEF on Twitter

Twitter with us
Banner
Follow Now

YouTube